World Library  

Add to Book Shelf
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Book

A Comparison Between Gradient Descent and Stochastic Approaches for Parameter Optimization of a Sea Ice Model : Volume 9, Issue 4 (09/07/2013)

By Sumata, H.

Click here to view

Book Id: WPLBN0004020668
Format Type: PDF Article :
File Size: Pages 22
Reproduction Date: 2015

Title: A Comparison Between Gradient Descent and Stochastic Approaches for Parameter Optimization of a Sea Ice Model : Volume 9, Issue 4 (09/07/2013)  
Author: Sumata, H.
Volume: Vol. 9, Issue 4
Language: English
Subject: Science, Ocean, Science
Collections: Periodicals: Journal and Magazine Collection, Copernicus GmbH
Publication Date:
Publisher: Copernicus Gmbh, Göttingen, Germany
Member Page: Copernicus Publications


APA MLA Chicago

Gerdes, R., Köberle, C., Kauker, F., Karcher, M., & Sumata, H. (2013). A Comparison Between Gradient Descent and Stochastic Approaches for Parameter Optimization of a Sea Ice Model : Volume 9, Issue 4 (09/07/2013). Retrieved from

Description: Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany. Two types of optimization methods were applied to a parameter optimization problem in a coupled ocean–sea ice model of the Arctic, and applicability and efficiency of the respective methods were examined. One optimization utilizes a finite difference (FD) method based on a traditional gradient descent approach, while the other adopts a micro-genetic algorithm (μGA) as an example of a stochastic approach. The optimizations were performed by minimizing a cost function composed of model–data misfit of ice concentration, ice drift velocity and ice thickness. A series of optimizations were conducted that differ in the model formulation (smoothed code versus standard code) with respect to the FD method and in the population size and number of possibilities with respect to the μGA method. The FD method fails to estimate optimal parameters due to the ill-shaped nature of the cost function caused by the strong non-linearity of the system, whereas the genetic algorithms can effectively estimate near optimal parameters. The results of the study indicate that the sophisticated stochastic approach (μGA) is of practical use for parameter optimization of a coupled ocean–sea ice model with a medium-sized horizontal resolution of 50 km × 50 km as used in this study.

A comparison between gradient descent and stochastic approaches for parameter optimization of a sea ice model

Athias, V., Mazzega, P., and Jeandel, C.: Selecting a global optimization method to estimate the oceanic particle cycling rate constants, J. Mar. Res., 58, 675–707, 2000.; Bocquet, M.: Parameter-field estimation for atmospheric dispersion: application to the Chernobyl accident using 4D-Var, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 138, 664–681, 2012.; Carroll, D. L.: Chemical Laser Modeling with Genetic Algorithms, AIAA J., 34, 338–346, 1996.; Cetin, B. C., Barhen, J., and Burdick, J. W.: Terminal Repeller Unconstrained Subenergy Tunneling (TRUST) for Fast Global Optimization, J. Optimiz. Theory App., 77, 97–126, 1993.; Chapman, W. L., Welch, W. J., Bowman, K. P., Sacks, J., and Walsh, J. E.:Arctic sea ice variability: Model sensitivities and a multidecadal simulation, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 919–935, 1994.; Coello, C. A. C. and Pulido, G. T.: A Micro-Genetic Algorithm for multiobjective Optimization, in: EMO 2001, edited by: Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Deb., K., Coello, C. A. C., and Corne, D., , LNCS 1993, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 126–140, 2001.; Hibler III, W. D. and Bryan, K.: A diagnostic ice-ocean model, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 17, 987–1015, 1987.; Eastwood, S., Larsen, K. R., Lavergne, T., Nielsen, E., and Tonboe, R.: Global Sea Ice Concentration Reprocessing Product User Manual, Product OSI-409, The EUMETSAT Network of Satellite Application Facilities, 2010.; Eisenman, I., Untersteiner, N., and Wettlaufer, J. S.: On the reliability of simulated Arctic sea ice in global climate models, Ge ophys. Res. Lett., 34, L10501, doi:10.1029/2007GL029914, 2007.; Evensen, G. and Fario, N.: Solving for the Generalized Inverse of the Lorenz Model, Journal of Meteorological Society of Japan, 75, 229–243, 1997.; Garcia-Gorriz, E., Hoepffner, N., and Ouberdous, M.: Assimilation of SeaWiFS data in a coupled physical – biological model of the Adriatic Sea, J. Marine Sys., 40–41, 233–252, doi:10.1016/S0924-7963(03)00020-4, 2003.; Gerdes, R. and Köberle, C.: Comparison of Arctic sea ice thickness variability in IPCC Climate of the 20th Century experiments and in ocean-sea ice hindcasts, J. Geophys. Res., 112, C04S13, doi:10.1029/2006JC003616, 2007.; Gerdes, R., Karcher, M. J., Kauker, F., and Schauer, U.: Causes and development of repeated Arctic Ocean warming events, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1980, doi:10.1029/2003GL018080, 2003.; Goldberg, D. E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 432 pp., 1989.; Harder, M.: Rauhigkeit und Alter des Meereises in der Arktis–Numerische Untersuchungen mit einem grossskaligen Modell, Ph.D. Thesis, Berichte zur Polarforschung, 203, Alfred-Wegener-Institut, 1996 (in German with English summary).; Harder, M. and Fischer, H.: Sea ice dynamics in the Weddell Sea simulated with an optimized model, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 11151–11162, 1999.; Hibler III, W. D.: A Dynamic Thermodynamic Sea Ice Model, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 9, 815–846, 1979.; Holland, D. M., Mysak, L. A., Manak, D. K., and Oberhuber, J. M.: Sensitivity Study of a Dynamic Thermodynamic Sea Ice Model, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 2561–2586, 1993.; Holland, J. H.: Adaption in Natural and Artificial System, A Bradfford Book, Univ. Michigan Press, 1975.; Hunke, E. C. and Dukowicz, J. K.: An Elastic-Viscous-Plastic Model for Sea Ice Dynamics, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 27, 1849–1867, 1997.; Hunke, E. C. and Lipscomb, W. H.: CICE: the Los Alamos sea ice model, documentation and software user's manual, LACC-98-16 v. 3. Los Alamos National Laboratory, NM, 2001.; Huret, M., Gohin, F., Delmas, D., Lunven, M., and Garçon, V.: Use of SeaWiFS data for light availability and parameter estimation of a phytoplankton production model of the Bay of Biscay, J. Marine Syst., 65, 509–53


Click To View

Additional Books

  • Ocean State Indicators from Myocean Alti... (by )
  • Assimilation of Sea-ice Concentration in... (by )
  • Tracers Confirm Downward Mixing of Tyrrh... (by )
  • Numerical Modelling of Thermodynamics an... (by )
  • Evaluation of Numerical Models by Ferryb... (by )
  • Adding Nitrate and Phosphate Separately ... (by )
  • Friction and Mixing Effects on Potential... (by )
  • Residual Circulation and Fresh-water Tra... (by )
  • Turbulent Mixing in the Seasonally-strat... (by )
  • Investigation of Suitable Sites for Wave... (by )
  • Towards Measuring the Meridional Overtur... (by )
  • Seasonal and Inter-annual Temperature Va... (by )
Scroll Left
Scroll Right


Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.